|

FINANCING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
FROM A VISION INTERNATIONAL
 |
Interviews
to Dr Andras Uthoff, Coordinator of the Unit of Special Studies of the
Economic Commission of United Nations for Latin America and the Caribbean
(CEPAL). Dr Uthoff is Commercial Engineer graduated in the University of
Chile, and has studies of Doctorate in economics in the University of
California, Berkeley, USA. He has made investigations in subjects of poverty,
employment and population; saving and finances for the development; capital
flows and macroeconomic policy; reform of the systems of pensions; among other
subjects. |
-
Which
is your perception on the vision of the international organisms and the
governments of the developed countries with respect to the problems of the
financing in the developing countries?
I
consider that the International Conference on Financing of the Development
held 18-22, march, 2002 in Monterrey, Mexico was an historical landmark about
the problems of developing financing in countries. Sponsored by the United
Nations, it acquired a particular look since becuase included aspects of
economic development within of the program of the international financial
institutions. The fact that in such event have been present forty chiefs of
state and governments, more than 200 ministers of foreign affair, trade,
development and finances, and the main authorities of the multilateral
financial institutions, guaranteed that the problems of development financing
have a preponderant place in the global agenda.
The
structure of the Consensus of Monterrey, specially in which it refer to the
actions to follow, offers a very comprehensive vision of the problem and
indicates diverse way for its solution. It included proposals to improve the
domestic and international efforts to mobilize resources for the development;
emphasized the importance of trade to get such objectives; not avoided the
discussion about importance of the official development assistance in some
countries. It did not omit references about problems of external debt either;
and, finally invocated to improve the coherence and cohesion between the
international institutions responsible of the financing and trade subjects.
-
In
that vision what role is assigned to the development bank in Latin
America?
The
role of the development bank in Latin America is fundamental in the solution
of two structural problems that are derived from the administration of risks
with market criteria. They are, assigning financing with horizons of long
term, and, make it in benefit of agents and sectors that are excluded by
private financial systems to be expensive and of greater relative risks.
-
Which
is your balance of the Summit of Monterrey after more of a year of held
it? What must be expected of her for more ahead?
A
year is a very brief term for evaluating advances from the proposals of the
Consensus of Monterrey. Mainly if the period post Monterrey has been
characterized by events that have affected of significant way the scene of the
global markets. I prefer to talk about the present challenges that mean to
transform this consensus into lines of effective action. From this perspective
I dare to emphasize the following challenges:
In
the domestic plane,
the increasing necessity by countercyclical macroeconomic policies, for which
it is useful to extend the concept of macroeconomic equilibrium beyond the
nominal equilibriums, incorporating real aspects like the stable economic
growth. It also emphasizes the development ordered and regulated of financial
markets strong, specially to solve the traditional problems of lack of
financing of long term, and its allocation towards the productive units that
in spite of their potentials lack access to this one.
In
the international plane
the challenge is that of the volatileness of the private sources of financing
and of the form as the international financial institutions can influence in
the decisions of the private investors, reducing the factors of "
contagion" and effects "herd" that have characterized it. In
the particular case of the Direct Foreign Investment the preoccupation exists
to link it to national objectives that promote the development through
improvements of the competitiveness, the integration of productive processes,
of the human and managemental resources, etc.
In
the plane of the commerce,
we see the necessity that the Agreements of Commerce consider in explicit form
monetary and financial developments that facilitate the diversification and
growth of the commerce, in order to harness their impact on the employment and
the equity.
In
the plane of the official development assistance, we observed the necessity that the developed countries fulfill with the
aid offered to developing countriess, but that its use be supervised, in
special when is to support national programs of fight against the poverty.
In
the case of tha debt
worries us the situation in that are left the countries that have serious
problems of Debt, and the difficulty that they have solve their problems of
liquidity after this has been restructured. In such sense the agility and
complementariness with that are used the resolution mechanisms must be a
priority, and the condicionalidad must be in line with the national strategies
of development that are established via democratic institutions.
Finally,
the increasing efforts of coordination and coherence that the multilateral
organisms make, must be harnessed throught regional agreements that induce the
coordination of macroeconomic policies, provide with liquidity in contingency
situations, facilitate the access to funds for the development financing and
promote trade agreements with advantages for the region.
-
In
many countries of the region the funds of insurances, funds of pensions,
and others, manages important amounts of resources How to do so that those
resources are going to finance the national productive sector, What can
make the development banking to help to that it is possible?
A
problem of "agency" in the case of funds of insurances and pensions
exists. The premiums and/or contributions are not voluntary but obligatory,
and therefore the State must assume the responsibility to avoid that fraud,
laziness, conflict of interests or a political use of the fund exist, and that
finally its cost is assumed by the affiliated.
In
order to solve the agency problem the State must adopt and enforce regulations
and supervisions in the types of investments where the accumulated funds can
be invested of way to protect investement of these resources, but it generates
trade off between yield and risk. The development bank could play a role in
the solution of this dilemma designing financial instruments that provide with
resources for investments in projects of "social interest" or of
"economic development of the country". Such instruments must
maximize the returns and diminish the risks for the affiliated ones so that
they are attractive for the directory of the funds, under the established
regulations. A regional particular case has been the one of the mortgage
promisory notes and the securitización of assets in developed countries.
-
To
make something new implies a cost. In the case of the development bank if
the innovation is successful the traditional bank enters to compete there,
then the development bank is pressed to leaves that business, can not
perceive completely the benefits of its innovation. ¿How to distribute
those costs so that they do not affect the results of the development
banks?
To
avoid compete with commercial financial institutions, the development banks
must to avoid create a permant and stable universe of clients, and only
support them in the initial stages their financial stories, and so soon
"graduated" leave for the commercial banks. The development bank
must not reprogramar neither the credit nor either capitalizes interest,
specially so it is supported in greater subsidies and state guarantees.
Despite it, they must "leverage" efforts ampler but destined to the
development of the national markets of long term.
The
development bank must complement and add resources without competing with the
commercial bank. The financial innovation cost has to be assumed by
contributions of the state. The most important is that such subsidies have to
be designed well, be transparent, and that their fiscal cost be explicit and
properly financed with resources from budget, so that the banks can obtain
earning of its current operations and of that form obtain additional resources
in the financial market.
-
Like
instruments of the financing policies of the State, the development banks
are exposed to too many external interferences in their administration,
would animate you to suggest how and what do to protect them of this?
To
avoid the political use of its resources, the development banks must improve
the transparency of its risk of portfolio by means of the permanent scrutiny
of these, advancing towards its budgetary autonomy and being put under
calification of risk of portfolio by external organizations. It means separate
the functions of evaluation of its portfolio; from financing of projects; and
of subsidize to the innovating or high-priority agents. This simple separation
of functions would demand of properly countable registries and would force to
the development banks to improve the handling of risks and its policies of
recovery of loans.
For
obtain this greater autonomy, their directories must assume legal
responsibility with respect to the results of their management. The equal that
the autonomous central banks, the development banks must to render accounts
annually to some authority, The Congress of the Republic, for example, on the
results obtained in function to its objectives, and be under a periodic
calification of its portfolio of risks by external auditors.
-
With
respect to the financing for the development what projects have CEPAL in
this subject, Could briefly comment us something on these projects?
We
are worried for the financial development. It is to say, the support to the
construction of solid financial markets in opposition to the simple vision of
liberalize these markets. Given the challenge to recovery the path from the
growth in the region, in a first project we have considered to review the
role, the función of the financial system as far as its development and
modernization. Within that interests to us to examine the form how the
development bank can complement and add resources of long term, for destining
them to sectors excluded by the commercial financial institutions due to its
high cost in financial systems oriented by market criteria. The hypothesis is
that the development banks can superate the problems of information
asymmetries that characterize to the financial markets, finishing with the
rationing and the segmentation of credit market that has affected mainly to
the small and medium companies, small agricultural owners, and the
constitution of technologically innovative companies.
Given
the challenge to reduce the volatileness of the external financing, in another
project we have considered fortify the coordination and cohesion between the
multilateral and regional organisms of development with the national financial
institutions. It worries us to the role of these institutions in periods of
shortage of private financing or in the design of instruments such as the
guarantees to assure the stable participation of the countries of the region
in the private markets. The central hypothesis is that an appropriate network
of international and national institutions of financing and provision of
liquidity can reduce the volatileness of the private financing and stabilize
the growth of the region.
For
the accomplishment of these projects we counted with the support of the
Interamerican Development Bank (IDB) and the German Agency of Cooperation
(GTZ). In both cases we contemplated to develop its activities in coordinated
form with Asociation Latinoamerican of Development Financing Institutions
(ALIDE).
June, 2003
|